December 10, 2025

Major Changes to the EPBC Referral Process – What You Need to Know

If you’re planning a project that may trigger the EPBC Act, approvals are about to work very differently.


The Commonwealth Government has introduced the most significant reforms to the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) in over two decades. These changes reshape how environmental referrals, assessments, and approvals are undertaken, with stronger national standards and new streamlined pathways.

 

Key Changes You Need to Know

  • Streamlined Assessment Pathway: Multiple older assessment routes have been consolidated into a single streamlined pathway. For eligible proposals, decisions may now be issued within 30 business days, provided the referral information is complete and robust.
  • Higher Upfront Information Requirements: Referrals must now include more detailed baseline data, impact analysis, and justification to qualify for the faster pathway.
  • Binding National Environmental Standards: All referral decisions must now align with new National Environmental Standards, ensuring proposals avoid “unacceptable impacts” and meet strengthened requirements for managing residual impacts.
  • Expiry of ‘No-Controlled-Action’ Decisions: A “no-controlled-action” determination will automatically lapse after five years unless the project has substantially commenced.
  • Creation of a New Federal Regulator: The reforms establish the National Environmental Protection Agency (NEPA), significantly increasing compliance oversight and enforcement powers.

 

Traditional Owner Engagement

The reforms strengthen expectations around early Traditional Owner engagement, particularly for projects affecting MNES such as listed ecological communities, wetlands, and culturally significant landscapes.


Proponents are now expected to:

  • Demonstrate early and proactive liaison with Traditional Owners or Native Title parties
  • Include cultural values, knowledge and perspectives in baseline information
  • Identify impacts on culturally significant species, places or landscapes
  • Show how Indigenous engagement has informed avoidance, mitigation, and offset planning


Early engagement is now considered essential for delivering a “complete” referral that qualifies for streamlined pathways.

 

How Redleaf Can Support Your Project

Redleaf can help you navigate the new EPBC requirements by:

  • Conducting early project screening and identifying risks
  • Preparing referral packages that meet strengthened information thresholds
  • Facilitating Traditional Owner liaison and integrating cultural values into project design
  • Updating impact and offset assessments
  • Advising on the suitability of streamlined vs. standard pathways

 

If you’re planning a future development or unsure how the reforms affect your project, our team is here to help.

Contact us to help with the new requirements »

Other Redleaf Group new articles you might enjoy

January 28, 2026
We are excited to announce the launch of redleafgroupheritage.au , showcasing our expanded Heritage Team and our full range of Cultural Heritage, Built Heritage, Native Title, and Training services. On the new site you’ll find: Heritage service overview Profiles of our heritage specialists Project examples and tailored solutions Cultural awareness and heritage training opportunities We welcome your feedback and invite you to explore the new site. Contact: heritage@redleafgroup.au
January 28, 2026
Through the year our teams undertake training in various areas. Earlier in the year, the ecology team at Redleaf Group spent a day in the field understanding the importance of riparian revegetation and learning about the methods used to support its regeneration. Riparian vegetation refers to the plant life that grows along the banks of rivers, streams, creeks, and other flowing bodies of water. These plants play a vital role in stabilising soil along waterways, helping to reduce erosion and sedimentation. In turn, this supports the health of our ecosystems by maintaining water quality for the plants and animals that depend on these habitats. They visited sites with varying levels of success, which helped them to better understand factors to consider when embarking on revegetation projects. Some factors include suitability of species to be planted, soil types, topography and the existing vegetation. The team are keen to revisit the sites in the coming months and years to see the progress of the little seedlings.